Comments on: Rolex Unveils Dazzling New Daytona Watches (Live Pics)

By: ViperRiper

ViperRiper — Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:43:07 +0000

Dismal. A truly fine watch doesn’t require so many gemstones. Simplicity and good taste are lost.

By: F1-Fanatic

F1-Fanatic — Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:28:17 +0000

In reply to Soul Storm. What? Maybe these aren't bejeweled enough?

By: MaddRedditor

MaddRedditor — Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:21:59 +0000

In reply to King Corey. Or maybe these Daytonas are the perfect status symbol for the guy who wants to project an aura of rugged masculinity... while also sparkling like a disco ball.

By: KillianTate

KillianTate — Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:15:41 +0000

In reply to Radzivon. I know it's a lot of bling. But it is rather handsome.

By: Kody Reeve

Kody Reeve — Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:05:06 +0000

In reply to Henry Aidan. Yeah, gems on a tool watch is next level crazy. Rolex things gems are going to cover all the shortcomings in the horological innovation department. Well guess what Rolex! Not!

By: BernardQuest

BernardQuest — Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:55:16 +0000

If bling is done right then the results can be spectacular while also being subtle.

If I wanted a bedazzled timepiece, I wouldn’t mind a Bulgari Octo Finissimo Tourbillon Skeleton set with baguette diamonds. It’s undeniably luxurious, but the diamonds are tastefully integrated into the ultra-thin case and skeletonized movement. Now that’s bling with some serious watchmaking finesse!